The Nigerian House of Representatives has passed a constitutional amendment bill aimed at establishing state police across the federation, marking a major step in ongoing efforts to restructure the country’s security system.
The bill seeks to amend key sections of the 1999 Constitution to provide a legal framework for the creation, funding, regulation, and operation of state police services, while retaining the Nigeria Police Force (NPF) as the federal policing institution.
Below are the key provisions of the proposed legislation and what they mean for Nigeria’s security structure.
National Assembly to Set Standards for State Police
Section 214 empowers the National Assembly to prescribe the structure, organisation, administration, and powers of both federal and state police formations.
A state police service will only become operational after a State House of Assembly passes enabling legislation and the service meets nationally defined minimum standards.
Implication
States will not have unrestricted authority to establish police forces. They must comply with federal minimum standards, ensuring uniformity across the country.
Federal Police to Continue Alongside State Police
The bill retains the Nigeria Police Force at the federal level, allowing it to continue its nationwide policing responsibilities even after state police are established.
Federal police may also support state police where necessary.
Implication
Nigeria will operate a dual policing system, similar to other federal countries, rather than replacing the existing national structure.
Federal Police Limited in State Operations
Under Section 214(6), federal police cannot interfere in state policing operations except under specific conditions such as:
- Breakdown of law and order
- Formal request by a state governor
- Ineffectiveness of state police due to administrative or financial failure
Any intervention must be approved by the National Police Council.
Implication
This provision limits federal overreach while still allowing emergency intervention under regulated conditions.
Governors to Appoint Commissioners of Police
Section 215 gives state governors the power to appoint Commissioners of Police, subject to advice from the National Police Council and confirmation by State Houses of Assembly.
Governors may issue directives on public safety, but such directives can be reviewed if challenged by the Commissioner.
Implication
While governors gain operational influence, safeguards are built in to prevent political misuse of policing powers.
President to Appoint Inspector-General of Police
The bill retains the federal command structure, allowing the President to appoint the Inspector-General of Police on the recommendation of the National Police Council and subject to National Assembly confirmation.
The IGP remains head of the federal police.
Implication
Federal authority over national policing and security coordination remains intact.
Strict Conditions for Removal of Police Chiefs
Section 216 outlines strict conditions for the removal of both the Inspector-General of Police and state Commissioners of Police, including:
- Grave misconduct
- Criminal conviction
- Financial or legal incapacity
Removal requires recommendations from the National Police Council and approval by two-thirds of the relevant legislature.
Implication
The provision is designed to protect police leadership from arbitrary political dismissal.
Federal Government May Fund State Police
Section 216A allows the federal government to provide grants or financial assistance to state police services upon approval of the National Police Council and National Assembly.
Implication
This ensures financially weaker states can still effectively operate police services without compromising national oversight.
States Can Set Higher Policing Standards
State Houses of Assembly are empowered to legislate on policing within their territories, provided they do not fall below national minimum standards.
States may also adopt higher operational standards if they choose.
Implication
States gain flexibility while maintaining a baseline standard for policing nationwide.
Federal Authorities Barred from Routine Control
The bill prohibits federal authorities from exercising routine operational control over state police, including powers such as:
- Deployment
- Transfers
- Discipline
- Appointments
Exceptions apply only in constitutionally defined emergency situations.
Implication
State police services are granted operational autonomy, strengthening decentralised policing.
National Police Council Expanded
The proposed amendment replaces the existing Nigeria Police Council with a broader National Police Council comprising:
- State Attorneys-General
- Retired police officers
- NHRC
- Public Complaints Commission
- NLC
- NBA
- NUJ
- Traditional rulers
Implication
The expanded council introduces wider civilian oversight and reduces centralised control of policing decisions.
State Police Service Commissions to Be Created
Section 197 establishes State Police Service Commissions responsible for recruitment, discipline, and administration of lower-ranking officers.
Also Read: FG moves to raise prisoners’ feeding allowance from ₦750 to ₦3,000 daily after damning Correctional Centre report
The commissions will include representatives from civil society, professional bodies, and traditional institutions.
They will also submit three nominees for Commissioner of Police positions.
Implication
This creates multiple oversight layers and reduces sole executive control over policing appointments.
Limited Powers Over Firearms and Data Access
The bill allows state police to use light arms and access biometric, forensic, and criminal databases in line with federal laws.
Implication
State police will be operationally empowered while remaining integrated into national intelligence systems.