The Workplace Leadership Institute (WLI) has identified teamwork as a critical factor in building high-performing organisations, urging leaders to prioritise workplace culture, relationships and structures that promote effective collaboration.
The institute said strong individual performance alone does not guarantee effective teamwork, particularly when employees lack a shared sense of purpose and collective responsibility.
It identified shared team identity, meaningful workplace connections, collective ownership, clear operating agreements and a results-driven culture as essential elements for strengthening team performance.
The institute emphasised continuous feedback and performance development as important strategies for sustaining team effectiveness.
Facilitator and workplace leadership expert, Dr Jamie Pajoel, said team cohesion could not be achieved merely by bringing talented employees together.
“A team becomes cohesive when people understand what they are collectively trying to achieve, trust one another enough to contribute fully and take responsibility for the success of the group.
“This requires deliberate leadership because cohesion is built through repeated experiences, shared standards and the way people work through challenges together,” he said.
The institute explained that a strong team identity could foster a greater sense of belonging and pride among employees, adding that leaders could reinforce this by helping team members understand their team’s distinctive role within the wider organisation.
It further encouraged organisations to recognise achievements that demonstrate effective collaboration and create opportunities for employees to build relationships beyond their immediate work assignments.
According to the institute, stronger interpersonal relationships provide a foundation for collaboration, particularly when teams face pressure, conflict or organisational change.
It also identified shared external challenges, including market competition, organisational transformation and demanding industry standards, as potential drivers of team cohesion.
The institute, however, cautioned that such challenges should not be allowed to fuel unhealthy competition among colleagues, noting that internal rivalry could undermine collaboration.
READ ALSO: FG commences demarcation of disputed oil, gas wells
It said a shared focus on external challenges could instead encourage mutual reliance and collective commitment.
On decision-making, the institute said employees were more likely to support collective decisions when they believed their views had been genuinely considered and understood the reasoning behind the final outcome.
It noted that effective participation did not require every employee to get their preferred outcome, but should provide meaningful opportunities for input and clarity about the direction eventually adopted.
The institute also highlighted the importance of formal team agreements outlining a team’s purpose, goals and operating principles.
It said such agreements could clarify communication, decision-making, roles, responsibilities and approaches to resolving disagreements.
According to the institute, involving employees in developing the agreements could encourage shared commitment rather than create the impression of instructions imposed by team leaders.
Beyond workplace relationships and culture, the institute stressed that team cohesion must ultimately translate into measurable performance.
It said maintaining a strong focus on tasks and results would enable teams to assess their progress, compare current performance with previous outcomes and identify areas requiring additional capacity or development.
The institute further advocated continuous monitoring and feedback, noting that effective performance assessment should consider both measurable output and the relational and cultural factors that influence future results.
It said feedback should not be limited to communication from leaders to employees, adding that team members should also have opportunities to assess leadership through team evaluations, 360-degree feedback and open discussions on team effectiveness.
Dr Pajoel urged leaders to regard team development as an ongoing responsibility rather than an occasional intervention.
“Teams are living systems. They develop, they experience pressure, they go through change and they can either become stronger or weaker depending on how they are led through those transitions.
“Leaders must therefore treat team development as a continuous strategic discipline rather than an occasional intervention,” he said.
The Workplace Leadership Institute said high-performing teams were shaped by the combination of clear purpose, strong relationships, effective structures, shared accountability and continuous learning.
It urged leaders to look beyond whether teams were merely busy or producing some level of output, stressing the need to create workplace conditions that enable employees to perform collectively at their full potential.