An Abuja High Court has struck out the criminal charges filed by the federal government against Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan, marking the conclusion of a highly publicised legal dispute that sparked nationwide discussion.
Records from the court revealed that the Office of the Attorney-General of the Federation filed a Notice of Discontinuance, which led to the formal dismissal of the criminal defamation and related allegations earlier brought against the Kogi Central lawmaker.
The matter, which drew serious public attention, originated from remarks purportedly made by Akpoti-Uduaghan during a television interview.
The prosecution had raised wider arguments on freedom of expression, political accountability, and how far prosecutorial authority should stretch in a democracy.
According to the case file, the Notice of Discontinuance dated December 12, 2025, effectively terminated proceedings in suit number FHC/ABJ/CR/195/2025.
Justice C. N. Oji, who presided over the case on Thursday, acknowledged the notice and struck out the charges.
In his ruling, he highlighted the importance of caution in the deployment of state prosecutorial powers.
“The court hopes that this decision will pave the way for restraint, healing, and respect for the rule of law in our democratic process,” he said.
Government lawyers also confirmed the withdrawal in court.
“On behalf of the Honourable Attorney-General of the Federation, we have filed a notice of discontinuance in line with the provisions of the Administration of Criminal Justice Act. This decision is taken in the overall interest of justice and public confidence in the legal system,” he said.
Senator Akpoti-Uduaghan reacted with satisfaction after the proceedings, insisting the outcome justified her stance.
“Today’s outcome affirms my belief in the rule of law. I remain committed to serving my constituents and defending the democratic rights of all Nigerians,” she said, expressing gratitude to her legal advisers and supporters.
The development comes after months of intense controversy and debate, with civil society actors and rights organisations previously describing the prosecution as a move aimed at silencing dissent and limiting political participation.