Abuja, Nigeria, following the nomination of activist and former presidential aide, Reno Omokri, for an ambassadorial position, a new report has emerged from the Senate, made available to The New Daily Prime on condition of anonymity, indicating that lawmakers clashed over Omokri’s past criticism of President Bola Ahmed Tinubu, including a controversial remark in which he referred to the then–APC candidate as a “drug baron,” an allegation he made publicly during the 2022 election season.
Although The New Daily Prime gathered that the Senate Committee has not received any formal petition against Omokri, several senators argued that his history of outspoken political commentary, particularly his frequent attacks on President Tinubu, could undermine his credibility in a diplomatic role.
Old Social Media Posts Resurface
The uproar intensified after lawmakers circulated a viral 2022 Facebook post in which Omokri questioned President Tinubu’s educational background and identity, demanding that he publicly produce his academic documents.
In the resurfaced post, Omokri wrote: “Emilokan, where are your certificates? The only reason Tinubu is now claiming that he did not attend any primary or secondary school is because if he comes clean about his early education, it will expose other lies he has told Nigerians about his true age and name.”
He continued: “How could Tinubu have been accepted to a university without prerequisite certificates? Tell us the names of your primary and secondary schools so we can track your classmates. We don’t want another Buhari without certificate!”
Omokri further questioned Tinubu’s political trajectory, writing: “Are Nigerians going to vote for a man who did not exist until he miraculously jumped primary and secondary school and went straight to university? A ghost? Bola Tinubu, show us your certificates!”
These comments, widely circulated during the heated 2023 election season, have now become a focal point in the Senate’s ongoing debate.
Supporters Say Past Criticisms Should Not Disqualify Him
A legal expert contacted argued that Omokri’s political commentary is protected under freedom of expression, insisting that diplomatic competence should be assessed on merit rather than past political disagreements.
One senator stated:
“If criticism of government disqualifies Nigerians from service, half of the country would be ineligible. Omokri has the right to his opinions just like any other citizen.”
Supporters also cite Omokri’s international advocacy, humanitarian initiatives, and global visibility as assets that could strengthen Nigeria’s diplomatic representation.
Opponents Cite ‘Diplomatic Incompatibility’
However, some senators contend that the role of ambassador demands restraint, tact, and diplomatic discipline—qualities they claim Omokri has not consistently demonstrated.
A lawmaker opposed to the nomination argued:
“This is not about free speech. It is about whether someone who has publicly attacked a sitting President with unverified allegations can genuinely represent Nigeria with loyalty and decorum.”
Others expressed concern that the resurfaced remarks could create diplomatic discomfort or be leveraged by foreign governments to question Nigeria’s internal unity.
The Presidency has not issued an official statement regarding the Senate’s division. However, insiders suggest the nomination reflects President Tinubu’s desire to project political tolerance, expand coalition alliances, and demonstrate confidence in his leadership.
The Senate Committee on Foreign Affairs is expected to review petitions and conduct additional background checks before issuing its recommendation. A final confirmation vote may depend on whether Omokri provides clarification or context regarding the resurfaced remarks.
For now, Omokri’s nomination has become the latest flashpoint in Nigeria’s intensifying political climate, raising fresh questions about free speech, political rivalry, and the standards for public office.